WebMar 30, 2024 · The provision was upheld in several lower courts in the case known as Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder but was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2013. The Supreme Court ruled that the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act—which determines which jurisdictions are covered by Section 5—is … WebJun 25, 2013 · Today’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder, a new challenge to the preclearance requirements, boils down to a new message to Congress: we warned you, you didn’t listen, and now it’s your problem to fix. The Court did not invalidate the actual preclearance provision of the statute.
Shelby County v. Holder: Less federal supervision of
WebShelby County v. Holder Docket Number: 12-96 Date Argued: 02/27/13 Play Audio: Media Formats: MP3: Download: Transcript (PDF) View To download file: ... Supreme Court at … WebOct 1, 2024 · This is Texas' first redistricting cycle in nearly half a century to take place without federal oversight, the result of a landmark Supreme Court decision from 2013, Shelby County v.... spring webclient with keystore and truststore
Laws and Court Cases National Archives
WebJul 21, 2024 · The Supreme Court isn’t even pretending that it’s bound by legal texts in its voting rights cases. ... And yet, in a trio of cases — Shelby County v. Holder (2013), Abbott v. WebMar 7, 2024 · The VRA was passed by Congress in 1965 during the Civil Rights Movement, and subsequently renewed in 1970, 1975, 1982, 1992, and 2006. Until 2013’s Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder, the VRA’s most powerful tool was Section 5. WebJun 25, 2013 · The Voting Rights Act was vital in 2012, not just 1965. For nearly five decades, it has been the nation’s most effective tool to eradicate racial discrimination in voting. And it is still critical today. The Supreme Court’s long-awaited ruling on voting rights case Shelby County v. Holder came down today, with the Court invalidating the ... spring webflow externalcontext